You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Was it a holo-deck or a holo-sphere? (Letters 6.2)

in Dream Steem • last month (edited)

In this idea, you separate yourself

No, I do not separate myself into two or more parts. Although I do not feel homogeneous I do not separate myself into parts.
There is secondo me a crucial difference between 'separating' and 'distinguishing': You can distinguish the reverse of the medal from its front side. You even can neglect one of the sides. If you want to separate each other, you'll have to change medium / dimension: You could take a picture of the reverse and thus get rid of the front.
So, every separation has to be inquired on its 'figurativeness' i.e. on its model character.

Returning to my comment, I want to repeat the words:

something like a mixture of hermeneutics and fantasy

last month in Dream Steem by
$0.00
    Reply 7
    Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     last month (edited)

    As I said... We are diving into Religious Extasy. (For the effect of my understanding of what you mean, separate or distinguish results in the same. Maybe I just did not use the most accurate word. I didn't say divide or split, and I really wasn't trying to signify that you broke yourself into two different parts). I can now safely think about this.

    [-]
     last month 

    Okay, you got my point on separation versus distinguishing and that's not only enough, it is important. From this point we can easily get distance from the special wording as we can be assured to point to the same.

    We are diving into Religious Extasy.

    This I did not understand.

    $0.00
      Reply
      [-]
       last month 

      I mean that you are pointing to experience art in the same way we experience the divine: as something meaningful without a possible translation into the rational.

      [-]
       last month (edited)

      Yes & No.
      The seen parallel is existent,
      but parallels might be misleading.
      (Seems impossible by the geometric point...)

      [edit]
      ..misleading since it is possible there are more parallels then the first one seen.

      [-]
       last month 

      It's just a point of comparison for reflection.

      $0.00
        Reply
        [-]
         last month 

        Comparisons are like models - they gain influence on the reflection.
        The more beautiful the model looks and the more fitting the comparison seems, the bigger is the influence - be it justified or not.

        [-]
         last month 

        Just a point. Not a full image. :)

        $0.00
          Reply