You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: There is going to be blasphemy here. Big time Blasphemy! Thank God for XVIII Century Illuminism. (Letters 8.0)

in Dream Steem3 months ago

P.S. - Also, I don't want to convince anyone. It's my own private personal religion. Works for me and, probably, for nobody else. Also, my shite explains the black matter problem. lmfao.

Sort:  
 3 months ago (edited)

If I present words to show my thoughts - be it a cooking advisory or my private personal religion (whicht might be the same...) - what is my communicational goal? What my intention? Just to show something like a hand woven towel or a work of some art? To only avoke one of my teacher's 'interesseloses Wohlgefallen' ('disinterested pleasure'; what means pleasure without any further purpose), which signifies this teacher's concept of aesthetics?

Dear @ty-ty,
after considerable thought given to this interrogation, I find your question arose four new questions for me: Is everything we do, Art? Why do emit our opinions, even into the void, like in a notebook or a diary that no one is expected to read? Does the fact that we exchange opinions, or debate eachother bear any meaning in the motion that Nietschinger's God-Cat does to undertand itself? Do all meaningless actions carry a meaning towards the self knowledge of the Total Conscience?

  1. No, it isn't.
  2. Because we are born to communicate.
  3. No, since there is no God-Cat at all.
  4. No, it's the other way round: meaning follows deductive, not inductive principles.
  1. I agree.
  2. Are we? Let me think about that.
  3. Funny.
  4. I also agree, except I have re-read the question and I understand I din't word it properly. Still, it's unimportant, as it was a question and not an opinion and we do agree on this. I will be giving further thought to number 2.

Good question. Let me think about it.. 'interessloses Wohlgefallen' seems to me an inherent contradiction. Wouldn't pleasure be the sum interest, in that case?