You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The History Of Vaccine Series
Oh, is this same "Dr" Garrow that said Obama is Saudi Arabia secret agent?
I actually checked the data that is listed here. Every statistic that "Dr". Garrow listed is not backed up by any reliable source. Absolutely not a single one. I am finishing my medicine studies so i know actual process behind Vaccine. Processes that are proven to be thousand times, if you were an expert (i see you are open for a healthy discussion and i respect that from you, but you are clearly not an expert, nor a Doctor) you should know that. It is nice to be suspicious , but this article (that you wrote really nice) is no more but a conspiracy theory
@pjcswart if you were reading what I said you would see that i mentioned "it is nice to be suspicious" but that is actually problem of people like you . YOU DON'T READ and that is actually why when people like you post an opinion 99 % of population sort it as unreliable. I believe you have Average or Above average IQ ( steemit is for open minded people) so i strongly suggest you explore and learn science behind vaccines. All anti-vaccine propaganda is not supported by any public reliable medicine magazine
Research who gives advertising money to medical magazines and grants to medical and science journals....It's the vaccine industry. No one wants to bite the hand that feeds it. Also read about the scandals that plague scientific journals regarding faking experiments and review board fraud.
https://www.vox.com/2014/12/7/7344963/scientists-scammed-at-least-110-academic-papers-into-publication
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-39054778
Proof?
people always think they have proof drugs/vaccines work because its in a peer reviewed journal, look what happens in some of the best journals > Arguably the most prestigious medical journal in the world, the New England Journal of Medicine regularly features articles over which pharmaceutical companies and their employees can exert significant
influence. Over a year-long period ending in August, NEJM
published 73 articles on original studies of new drugs, encompassing
drugs approved by the FDA since 2000 and experimental drugs, according to a review by The Washington Post. Of those articles, 60 were funded by a pharmaceutical company, 50 were co-written by drug company employees and 37 had a lead author, typically an academic, who had previously accepted outside compensation from the sponsoring drug company in the form of consultant pay, grants or speaker fees. Just when you think you have proof drugs/vaccines work, think again!! http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/as-drug-industrys-influence-over-research-grows-so-does-the-potential-for-bias/2012/11/24/bb64d596-1264-11e2-be82-c3411b7680a9_story.html
Thank you for the additional information @truthtrain. I try and keep things simple when debating. The information from you and others help me so much. Also I don't like to debate people who start off the debate with an insult, usually using their qualifications for being in the know and bringing up the word conspiracy...I don't debate people who start calling names or saying they know more than I do.... it is a waste of my time.
Well Said!
So True What A MESS!!!
Honestly today i have seen the right platform to get information. Thanks to you. Really reallly greatful
Thank you @cyprianj
Only 6% of drug advertising material is supported by scientific evidence
http://www.bmj.com/content/328/7438/485.2.full
Doctors trusting drug thugs for their information
http://www.bmj.com/content/328/7438/485.2.full
Thank you so much for your kind words @iamemir! I hope you have a WONDERFUL day!
Whats wrong with conspiracy theories? I don't think this is one anyway, I think these are facts!
Conspiracy facts
Like the whole jfk thing...
@iamemir, This statement was made back in the 1920s. The good doctor is dead and doesn't know Obama and I have no clue about secret agents, muslims, or Obama...can you give me a citation?