Sort:  

Hey @justineh thanks for replying. It is appreciated.

I agree with you, abuse is not good for the ecosystem. I would add that it is especially not good for the individuals on the receiving end.
I can also agree that flags most certainly have their place and valid uses as a last resort.

However I have only seen the valid use of flags rarely.

So the real question I have is, when are you going to stop ignoring the rampant abuse of the system through account farming/self voting/shit posting and abusive flagging of the bernie group of accounts?
The behavior is a clear violation of the terms of service and is clearly not conducive to a healthy ecosystem.

After all, that's what want, a healthy ecosystem that will attract investors right?

Your obsession with @berniesanders is pathetic. Get a life.

Well I can’t really do anything about TOS, I don’t own the site. I also believe there are many accounts doing more harm than the “Bernie ones” you mention.

I’m aware of his downvotes to specific accounts and even though I’m not a fan of downvoting due to disagreements, I also think our actions have consequences and many accounts feel they can troll and attack then cry foul when it’s returned. I would argue these accounts who are causing harm are also driving investors away.

So, I’m one who feels the situation is not as black and white as it’s painted to be.. with that being said I’ve flagged his accounts many times and hope he finds a more positive path.

It’s not my fight, I do what I can.

(And when I tried to make it my fight and solve the “turmoil”, your buds are the ones who viciously attacked me ... so maybe you guys need to look in the mirror a bit.)

i disagree with you a a few things in your reply. I will only bother to address the two most personal to me.

If you are unaware of the driven away investors, you have not been paying attention.
And, the ''your buds'' comment I take a personal slur on my character.

Your obsession with @berniesanders is pathetic. Get a life.