You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Real World cost from the Hard Fork 2.whatever!
sir smithlabs...are you trying to depress us? I would give it a week like they said it would take before I did anything drastic. And if you want leaders to see this post you'd need to use the tags steem and steemit and I think alot of people would see it then. but well written and I hope it all works out so you don't have to leave.
Me too, do not want to leave, but they did shake my faith. I could build an obscene gaming computer running those six machines in parallel, no one would even understand why I was destroying them in any game, ROFLOL!
I have been in charge of a number of projects, including software packages. I never would have allowed the release of software this undefined. The first task is a roadmap of where you are, and where you must end up. All I/O are part of that plan, including trials with end users at the prototype alpha stage (for critical feedback) on a contained server.
We will see for sure!
>:(sir smithlabs! are you into online gaming too? well that doesn't sound fair to have 6 computers hooked up! lol.
So you are saying that this wasn't the way to do this hardfork?
The FIRST step to a software package is to talk to those who actually use the software. Ask about the problems they see, and bring up difficulties you see, and ask them what THEY think. Sometimes what the programmers see as a problem does Not bother those actually using that program. Correcting a non-problem is a poor use of time. Writing code no one wants; is an even poorer use of time!
Launching it without testing is a terrible way to test software. We always alpha tested our software at a few above average locations; before we repaired problems, and did a limited beta test. One more iteration of problem repair, and we had a version 1 software. This always worked well, and some of the software ran without changes for years.
After I figured out the programming, I was done with the games. They have some now that use a lot more computer power, and it might might be fun to destroy some of the kids with their gaming computers, by brute force, ROFLOL! Hooking it to a big screen TV with a obscene video card, and a chair mounted joystick and foot keys might be amusing.
>:(hahaha! sir smithlabs! that idea about destroying the kids with your bank of computers is hilarious, that would be a hoot!