Are we in the midst of a 21st century civil war?

in #geoengineering4 years ago

image.png

If we are now being told by the approved media that Bill Gates is thinking about polluting the stratosphere with sun blocking chemicals I think we can assume that media outlets (or maybe call them mouthpieces? That expression was originally coined to describe Mafia lawyers) like Popular Mechanics are the second last to know about the issue, the last informed being we the public. A further logical assumption would be that since a media advertising campaign to normalize the lowering of temperatures by cloud creation is being foisted on us, we can assume it's already well under way. But the devil is in the details; exactly where is it being done and why?

People who have noticed this cloud creation experimentation in certain areas (Hawaii and Vermont for example) and called it Chemtrails, a pun on con[densation] trails, have been smeared as 'conspiracy theorists' for years. Now everything they said is announced to be Bill Gates's philanthropic plan for the good climatic health of the planet – not that any of those old conspiracy theorists are getting credit.

And the warnings the Chemtrail believers give us are also continuing to be silenced. Dimming the sun's light by creating enduring cloud cover over the entire globe way up in the stratosphere would sure cool the planet alright. It would be the equivalent of nuclear winter. It would shorten the growing season for the billions of people in tropic and temperate zones who feed themselves and their customers with the bumper crops of wheat, corn, soybeans, rice and other food and fodder crops that are now coming along thanks to increased CO2 being released from the warming oceans just in time to feed the growing population of Earth. Are there plans to reverse this chemical cloud creation activity just in case it proves as disastrous as predicted? Nope. Not that we hear.

But this is about "Global warming"? And military authorities are going to spend the money and resources to blanket the planet for "Global warming"? Look. Military people do things for military reasons, for war making, for screwing up the other guy's country and not their own.

I wonder if the sensationalization of this cloud creation technology is a cover. Bill Gates is a Rockefeller protege. OK? Think Intelligence connection. Think Disinformation Ops. Bill Gates draws media fire with everything he says; both the Hate Bill and the Love Bill sides send up the most blinding fireworks over Vaccinations, Land acquisition, Food monopoly, everything the guy burps, farts and invests in. I've sent up my own squibs galore. Now Bill is going to cover the planet in shade like Mr Burns? It's sticking in my throat. It's too much like a bad Superhero movie.

There's a scare documentary just come out on the internet about global dimming being planned by Bill Gates and his military connections. But the first couple of minutes contained a statement that stuck in my craw: "Modern jet engines burn cleanly. They don't produce condensation trails". That's a deceptive remark. Jet airliner engine exhaust is invisible at low altitude (no smoke) because it's mainly water vapour. When airliners get up to cruising altitude of 25,000 to 35,000 feet that water vapour instantly freezes. These ice crystal trails will disperse, fade or linger just like the natural Cirrus clouds of ice crystals at these high altitudes.

But in my considered opinion, and sure I could be wrong as hell, these natural trails and clouds have nothing to do with the crisscross trials and bands of cloud lingering for weeks at low altitudes which have been observed over Texas and neighbouring states during this past winter. The cloud cover over Texas noted by NASA satellites in February was placed very neatly just in time to deepen the severity of the Polar Vortex that so surprisingly leapfrogged down from central Canada. The cloud cover was even neatly eliminated over Austen. That scare documentary got right one thing for sure: the means to lay down such cover by military tankers is practical and has been for decades. And the USAF has those means. They can do weather modification over foreign countries to damage their food production. The only thing different about the big freeze over Texas if it really was weather modification is that this weather warfare would have been done on Texas, not Iran.

Sure, maybe I'm silly. But look at the facts. Means and opportunity were both present: the USAF has the means, the tanker capability; the winter weather provides the opportunity and so does the political corruption of the ERCOT power authority. The motivation is plain to see: to punish Texas for its lawsuit, joined by 21 states, alleging election fraud which was only stopped because the SCOTUS is a political tool.

Motive, means and opportunity, that's the recipe for crime and the beneficiary is too obvious. And now Texas is inundated with weaponized migration to the benefit of the Biden administration, a fraudulent president and a congress full of election cheaters. And I suspect they have the USAF on their side – but not the Army or the Marine Corps. Is this what US Civil War in the 21st century looks like? I suspect it is.