You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Why Developers Need To Stop Taking Streamers More Seriously Than The Rest Of Their Players.

in #gaming7 years ago

Extremely interesting topic. You just inadvertently talked about Democracy, and the difference between Direct Democracy and Representative Democracy.

At some point in history, players became involved in a game's creation process. Before that point it was substantially easier - the developer developed the game, released it, got feedback through market and media, got back to developing with more experience and more feedback. The developers could impress upon the game their style, their brand, their views and ideas. For some reason, this process was not good enough, and it was decided that both minor and some of the major developers had to receive direct feedback from their users directly, at all time, at every phase of the creative process. That's where things get messy, because you either decide to listen to everyone - and I mean read every comment on every platform - or you decide to listen to the closest thing to a representative - streamers, curators, famous gamers. So it became sort of a democracy. Streamers are not really elected, but are chosen according to their following. Their followers choose them not because of their competence and experience, but because of their charisma and entertainment capacity - much like in real politics. And so it starts.

I agree with you in the end. I think games should get back to reflecting the ideas of the developers. If I think about the games that have changed history, I think "what would have happened if they had changed this crucial element, this innovative action, this plot turning point mid-way just because some players didn't like them?"

Sort:  

Could you imagine games like Metal Gear Solid, Banjo Kazooie, Legend of Zelda, Counter Strike and the like being a community based project? they'd be a fucking nightmare and wouldn't be the legends that they are today, they'd be colossal cluster fucks, the problem is as we enter the post information era, everyone feels their opinion should be taken seriously when in actuality, most peoples opinions are fucking stupid and doesn't work.

I'd love to see a return to closed development of games where we get the finished product, then we can critique it instead of constant early access interference.

Thanks for the massive response my dude though!

That's my point exactly.

most peoples opinions are fucking stupid and doesn't work.

Fuck politically correctness, am I right? ahahah
Don't get me started on people and opinions, we'd need a separate post for that one...anyway that's the short version I guess.

Thank you buddy, you can only have a good response if your post was good for discussion in the first place :D