Thanks for the response. I get that you can WHAT IF away a new idea pretty easily, that's probably a reason why many potential entrepreneurs never actually try their ideas in business, it's always easier to find reasons why something wont work than reasons that it could work.

Although I've always understood that the NAP does allow for defensive force, I was never sure what the rule was for reactionary force after the fact. I wasn't sure if the principle did leave room for retribution or justice. I'll be sure to take note of that for further consideration.

I almost responded with more concerns of mine regarding voluntarism (I'm in that area between conservative and libertarian at the moment) but it started to turn into a novel. I'm looking at what I'm outlining and I'm thinking instead of a response to you specifically it might make more sense for me to write an article. So for the time being I'll commend you for the insightful material and gather my thoughts a bit more.