---

What is the main trigger for movie disaster success? Not just a big budget. Remember, The Impossible succeeded in convincing their pre-tsunami in 2004 despite having only a 45-million-dollar budget. Putting disaster on other elements and bringing the audience in the middle is the most important point. So when Geostorm never realized the deadly situation as promised, it means Dean Devlin's directing debut is failing to fulfil its essence. Not surprisingly, because the film has changed four times the release date, one of which due to the results of a bad screening test that forced the re-taking is done.

The opening scene is promising, telling the collaborative efforts of 17 countries to create a weather control satellite called "Dutch Boy" to stop the global disaster. Jake Lawson (Gerard Butler) is the leader of the project. But once the conditions are secure, Jake is actually "kicked" from the team, replaced by his sister, Max (Jim Sturgess). Human nature who are willing to unite when afflicted by trouble only to give importance to the ego after returning to feel safe, at a glance implied, though unfortunately it is really explored, Three years later, strange events began to invade various countries, beginning with the frozen Afghan desert region. Malfunctions on Dutch Boy are suspected to be the cause. Jake was asked to serve again at the space station to detect the destruction of its homemade satellite before the geostorm, a giant storm of global scale that will end the world. It sounds epic, and the movie promises that when the duration of the audience is shown tsunami, earthquake, hail, and others. But geostorm itself was never realized. Leaving a non-global-scale destruction just glimpsed for the audience.

Would not if geostorm lasted the meaning of doomsday? Right, and not a problem. 2012 Roland Emmerich be an example when humans are not able to stem the "doomsday", the focus is given to the struggle for survival. Indeed prioritize preventive efforts can be interesting as long as struggling in activities to challenge death like Michael Bay show through Armageddon. In Geostorm, the protagonist is more busy fiddling with the computer that wasted Gerard Butler's talents. Less wise to pay Butler to utter scientific sentences instead of action saving the world as a hero action. Just a sequence of actions he can, it was acted in a spacesuit.

In short, the protagonists are rarely placed directly at the centre of chaos. Max and Sarah (Abbie Cornish), her lover, as well as members of the secret service, had stuck a light thunderbolt, but Devlin chose to focus the camera on the car driven rather than damage around. Devlin could have written the script of five Emmerich movies, but he did not "catch" the filming capacity of the disaster movie maestro. Devlin staging is very bad. Instead of being led into it, the role of the audience is limited to an observer of inconsequential events because the CGI is bad. Even the city's (especially Russian) urban drafting CGI also seems ridiculous.

Lack of catastrophic execution of scenes both of quantity and quality, Geostorm has almost no gratifying factor. His family drama failed to touch the result of the banal excavation of manuscripts by Dean Devlin and Paul Guyot. Even his cast performance is less supportive where only Talitha Bateman (Annabelle: Creation) comes through a brief appearance as Jake's daughter is able to handle the emotional moment. Similarly, the humour inserts are like half-hearted players, except Zazie Beetz with his deadpan tickling style. 

---

RATING (3/10)

---

Don't forget, give your feedback in the comment section

---

---

^{Image Source}