You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Ethics VS Aesthetics - How to stop arguing & unite people to create a free society
you have the right to own land, it does not harm anyone or violate their property or their "nest" so to speak
you have the right to own land, it does not harm anyone or violate their property or their "nest" so to speak
So it's first come first serve? How much property is acceptable to "own" before it does potentially cause harm? What if the people who "own" the property upstream from you decide to dump toxic waste in the water because it's theirs? What about potential reparations to the indigenous Turtle Island tribes? I'm not disagreeing with anything here... These are just the questions that come up for me that I would love assistance in when envisioning the shift.
so what would be your solution?
Well, I always attempt to use clear communication first. But if that doesn't work, not sure I have an answer in speculation yet. That's why I enjoy bouncing these inquiries off of intelligent folks such as yourselves. You have any ideas?
I have to admit that, while I love the premise of anarchy and voluntaryism and agree with them ethically, there's still a part of me that resists the complete release of "governance". It's a curious mental predicament I find myself in, and I'm excited to find the pieces that reconcile my thoughts.
I just think if we are to look for a solution we should look for a non-violent one. If you have to use violence against a peaceful person to achieve a specific goal, then that is wrong and should be opposed.