“missing“ documents are clearly listed in section I. List of accompanying documents and were included in the package …
“missing“ documents are clearly listed in section I. List of accompanying documents and were included in the package …
Documents that the ECHR representative allegedly could not find are clearly listed in section I. List of accompanying documents, i.e.:
- Item #10: Decision refusing to initiate an investigation, dated April 14th 2014
- Item #34: Complaint for infringement of a party’s right to hear the case in preparatory criminal proceedings without undue delay, filed on June 5th 2018
- Item #36: Court's decision regarding the complaint for infringement of a party’s right to hear the case in preparatory criminal proceedings without undue delay, along with confirmation of delivery of that decision on November 22nd, 2018
- Item #37: Medical negligence lawsuit, Michal Siemaszko vs European Patient Service s.r.o. et al, case no. 60 C 328/2018
Those were included in the parcel I sent, and there are no other documents concerning these issues, so no other documents could possibly be provided.
Sources:
- Infographic depicting recent ECHR (European Court of Human Rights) issue
- Documentation related to the ECHR complaint from May 2019 http://not.surgery/documentation/#echr-201905
- Complete set of photographs (along with original EXIF metadata) depicting contents of the package http://not.surgery/echr-complaint-201905-package-contents/
- Recent call with the European Ombudsman (audio) https://soundcloud.com/beatpoetic/do-eu-institutions-cover-up-jus-cogens-crimes-medical-experimentation-performed-without-consent
- Gamifying crime (video-presentation)