You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: SLC S22 Week3 || Inheritance and Polymorphism in JAVA

in #dynamicdevs-s22w37 months ago

Thank you, @akmalshakir, for publishing an article using our tag #dynamicdevs-s22w3. We have assessed your article and present the results of the evaluation below.

Criteria Remark
#steemexclusive
Free of Plagiarism
AI Article ✅ Original (Human text!)
Bot free

Task 1 (1/1)

The explanation of inheritance using the Person and Student classes was clear and insightful. The detailed breakdown of attributes, methods, and the role of method overriding enhanced understanding. Excellent demonstration of inheritance and method extension.


Task 2 (0.75/0.75)

The implementation of method overloading in the Shape class was effective. Each area computation was tailored for different shapes, and the boolean flag added robustness to distinguish method calls. The explanation added value to understanding method overloading.


Task 3 (0.75/0.75)

The use of method overriding in the Bank class hierarchy was thorough. The implementation clearly demonstrated how specific interest rates are returned by overriding methods in derived classes. Polymorphism was well utilized and explained.


Task 4 (1/1)

The Vehicle, Bike, and Truck hierarchy effectively demonstrated polymorphism. The explanation of dynamic method dispatch and how runtime object types determine method execution was excellent.


Task 5 (1.4/1.5)

The Library Management System showcased strong understanding of inheritance and polymorphism. The menu-driven interface, error handling, and integration of Books and Magazines were impressive. Including more robust edge-case handling would make the system even stronger.


Task 6 (1.8/2)

The Employee Management System demonstrated a well-structured class hierarchy and proper use of abstraction. The error handling and runtime validation added robustness. However, edge cases could be addressed more comprehensively to achieve perfection.


Task 7 (1/1)

The analysis of class relationships was insightful and accurate. The detailed breakdown of valid and invalid instructions, along with explanations of runtime and compile-time errors, demonstrated a deep understanding of inheritance and casting rules.


Task 8 (2/2)

The geometric inheritance program was exemplary. The relationships between Point, Rectangle, and Parallelogram classes were well-explained. The overridden methods, area calculations, and extensibility of the program highlighted mastery of OOP concepts.


Comment/Recommendation

Your article provided an excellent showcase of OOP concepts, particularly inheritance, polymorphism, method overloading, and overriding. The detailed explanations, structured implementations, and practical examples were impressive. Including additional edge-case handling in Tasks 5 and 6 would further enhance the overall robustness.


Final Score:

Total | 9.7/10