Well, the State of Alaska ran a trial run for something like this, actually that might, might work as a sort of Universal Basic Income. It worked insofar as it didn't bankrupt the State, but it wasn't much of a game-changer. Essentially a portion of all the State's oil and gas revenue was divided up between all residents. To save manpower on dispersing it, it was simply added to their tax refund.
Perhaps if something similar happened with a certain percentage of the state revenue you described (emphasis: a certain percentage. A government still has to run, cops and soldiers don't pay themselves nor do firefighters), being distributed to all residents. But here's the thing: it's not a set amount, but a share of a set percentage. The more money the State makes, the more you make. Or rather, the bigger the pie, the bigger your piece. The amount wouldn't be guaranteed because it goes up or down with the State's economy. This way, even those who say "I just want to be an artist" have a vested incentive to do SOMETHING, no matter how slight, to make society more productive in a practical way, because their pocketbooks would be directly effected.
The Left will never go for it because it would require them to work, and the Right will never go for it because it smacks of Socialism, but I think something like it might be worth trying, at least on a small scale. If it doesn't work, it can be scrapped.
Further, in Federal societies (such as the US), I would say there should be two levels of this: one for the State and one for the Federation/Union. If it was solely the state, poorer states would say "my labor supports companies in California, but I don't get a share of California's revenue." If it was only Federal, people in Houston or New York would complain "why does West Virginia get a share of the federal income I bust my ass handing in?"
If, say, 5% of State revenue and 5% of federal revenue (that percentage might be too high or too low but I'll leave the exact figure to better economists than me), then every citizen gets some tiny share of the benefits reaped by society being more productive, but that share is not enough that they can sit on their butts and do nothing with their life.
It is not a trial, it started in 1982 and it still happens today. Alaska basically created a fund, the money for the fund comes from taxing the revenue of oil corporations in Alaska. Everyone who lives in Alaska, once per year gets a paycheck from the government anywhere from $300-$2000 just for living in Alaska.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alaska_Permanent_Fund
Alaska Permanent Fund
The Alaska Permanent Fund is a constitutionally established permanent fund managed by a state-owned corporation, the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation (APFC). It was established in Alaska in 1976 by Article 9, Section 15 of the Alaska State Constitution under Governor Jay Hammond. From February 1976 until April 1980, the Department of Revenue Treasury Division managed the state's Permanent Fund assets, until, in 1980, the Alaska State Legislature created the APFC. As of the end of 2016, the fund is worth nearly $55 billion that has been funded by oil revenues.
I stand corrected regarding the semantics, as it seems you are more familiar with the finer details of the program (including its age) than I am.
I stand by the rest of the post though.