You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: (? Part Speech = 010, Full Speech = 101

in #csychology4 years ago (edited)

I do not know how we went from text_lines to chat_bubbles really that is not what I predicted (and we call what/that accessibility?).

text_lines -> chat_bubbles = accessibility_specification? (Whatwg!?)

Why is a text processor not the example like paper is blank as a rule? I mean I really like your bubble design, who/what shows me how that passed the accessibility spec again?

How much time does Mark Z devote to going through the intelligently designed bubbled text, and can either cite a Great Books Program that used that reasoning at the printer, thinking about being a reader, is that helping us read?

Why has the advent of information design changed book format into Pre-K style line spacing, is that wath or do we really call that part math?