You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Sound is Linear. (? If/The Sound is Emotion AKA #WereYou17Before18Too? #IsMomErDadOrOtherYourFirstWord? #WhatWouldThatDo? #Centreal #037 #Realityl #37 & && (? I, Mom, Dad, Other)) ) [NOTES/MINDMAP/PROTOTYPE/SPEC/SCHEMA/BRAINSTORM/DRAFT/*STILL*EDITING]
I just realized when I repeat I should use the "[...]" punctuation/symbol.
So I should do "[...] and the rest of edited/iterated sentence addition.".
So grammar has a ("native") Threaded Reply feature ("by default")? I mean, astericks (*) are not the same usage, and some sites use "[...]" to mean "[Read further...]", though grammar still lacks formal parameters to codify the meaning? #GrammarThreadedReplyFeature #GrammarThreadedReply #GrammarFeature
Okay, the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ellipsis (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ellipsis&action=history) presently is introduced formally as "also known informally as dot-dot-dot" at the beginning, in the first line. I realize that is not including the ellipses with brackets (seemingly not a asterisms or dinkus either), the "bracket ellipses" if so-called, yet.
Ok I thought the "[...]" with 3 dots of grammar might qualify for the "30" calendar indices, following the role modeling of the hexspeaking buffer.com bosses. Naturally, I am not using buffer AI/automation/algorithms, I am manually writing and timestamping myself not with scripts, and getting the same result as a Buffer Boss who has help, my version being the human version, I actually was reading the clock by myself.
Also, I made that "[...]" comment my 18th post (https://steemit.com/csychology/@scribe/qfvruv#@scribe/qfvruv) apparently according to what the "nodes/mirrors" at https://steemd.com/@scribe and https://steemblockexplorer.com/@scribe say.
By the end of the "8th" month but I missed the "1" (in the "31" a day later) I could have associated by using the paid plan at https://www.buffer.com (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffer_(application)) like a boss, err, "like a boss" https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/like_a_boss.
I think that is like choreography. (Well, grammar choreography? Well, maybe astrological grammar choreography somewhat. In a realm where grammar rules can be used/reffed/refereed for sport of thought (to riff the "poverty of thought" medical terminology, with a counter/neocounterlogism of "wealth of thought" as serious business too), I think we can establish/recognize some nuant/nuanced fact.)
My sentiment is for the serious logological question between
[.], [..], [...](how many dots, by definition [can be processed by humans, is not a NN neural network q]) being from centuries of mathelingual distinction, the question to be determined now being not just the value of the original meaning but also the ability to counter reason/meaning.Maybe that's three because I had two parents and one grandparent at my original family home, is such meaning
sigintersignifier? Is that Self Grammar our Signals Intelligence or a Psychological Signifier? Is family a degree or your degree, is that a degree of our grammar, should we sign and count the degrees ourself?... .My sentiment is for the serious self queries where knowing Parent(N) is delineable is alone by itself a burden of the form of question, if the Family Unit is a mathlang problem to represent. My problem of consciousness was feelings defining the Family Unit (and qualifying N parent(s) is a real math/word problem) set.
My sentiment is that the logolit dots/points between word/number association, and the markers delimiting a family language unit, are sensitive problems of consciousness, quantum to grammar, gramotion(s).
Ellipsis
The ellipsis ..., . . ., or (in Unicode) …, also known informally as dot-dot-dot, is a series of (usually three) dots that indicates an intentional omission of a word, sentence, or whole section from a text without altering its original meaning. The word, (plural ellipses) originates from the Ancient Greek: ἔλλειψις, élleipsis meaning 'leave out'.Opinions differ as to how to render ellipses in printed material. According to The Chicago Manual of Style, it should consist of three periods, each separated from its neighbor by a non-breaking space: . .