In this post, you are completely wrong.

I mean, really. You need to go edit it.

Everywhere you use Einstein you need to replace it with Newton and Cavendish.

Anyway, it was Cavendish that lied about gravity.
And science has believed ever since that gravity is an effect of mass.

However, Newtons laws only predicted the path of Mercury to about 90%.
Then Einstein's theories predicted the path of Mercury to about 96%.
However, there is a lady who recently published her book that throws out Newton and Einstein and predicts the path of Mercury to about 99.9999%

Further, if gravity is based on mass, why does big G change so very much all over the surface of the earth?

And, that idea of cloud of dust collapsing and forming a star is mere speculation. It has never been seen. Further, actual observations have shown that stars do not have life cycles like we thought. With some stars turning to red giants, and then back.

Interesting times for people who want to do actual science.