The third article makes a crucial yet underrated point. Scientific data can come to any conclusion, but the more time that passes and the more data that accumulates will give a more accurate prediction of what is to come in the future.

Trends of the past are important, but not necessarily replicable.

The beauty (or cause for worry) of markets is that even the best data can never predict accurate results because there are new variables introduced at all times. All of this being said however implies that the more money invested by the biggest possible pool of people should(not will) give more stability and growth to the market as a whole.