How Bankers are trying hard to screw up the Crypto World - or dying trying
I have been dabbing in the Crypto world for a couple of years now.
As everyone else I guess, I started pussyfooting about at first while I tried to built an education for myself by reading, watching videos and making an effort to understand a complete new world, where money is created to back up something that will be built in the physical world with the contribution of everyone that votes a project vs another one.
We could say that the crypto money are our democratic vote, we choose what we invest in, we root for the project, we bring it into reality.
What did bankers do - and when did they join the crypto world?
I believe that they saw immediately the potential of cryptos to make us independent from the money system, honest to god, must have scared the shit out of them, they built a huge empire on monopoly money ow in peril as we started to democratize the money system through the internet.
For some reason, I see bankers as the manifested reality of our wildest dreams, who wouldn't like to be in a position of such power to determine the outcome of world politics, having the ability to live above and beyond the law, having the freedom of choice in any field of life about where to live, where and what to eat or drink, freedom to move around the world, which elitist schools to attend etc. - all of us for sure.
Unfortunately these positions in the world are limited and they pass on from family to family in a very tight close circle, my guess is they would like to keep it that way and have become very skilled in not letting anyone else into the game.
So, when the cryptos exploded, they had 2 desires, capitalize on them BEFORE breaking it all down.
The Money game is their pet toy, that's how they see it and they won't share it, they never did - they would really like to not have to do that in the future either.
So, how do we know they capitalized on cryptos?
Come on guys, who put into the game the Capital to raise the stake to the level it went, who had that kind of Capital, hello?
Plus we can trace back the moment they entered to the launch of Ethereum.
Why do I believe this?
Think about it. when did we start to have to pay GAS to move on the chain?
Isn't that a familiar business model, resembling something that they ALREADY do with the banking system?
Yeap, they came in with the existing banking system model because basically, if something worked for so long - don't try to fix it, don't change it, just keep milking the same model because the sheeples didn't get it when we were doing it with banks, they won't see it coming when we'll do it with their Cryptos.
At the same time, they allowed a bridge between the 2 worlds, the Crypto world and the Fiat world, I refuse to call the Fiat World ''the Real World' - it's Not fucking Real, you just believe it more than you believe in cryptos - that's all the difference.
So, for 2 years, they didn't only allow Wirex to trade in cryptos, they laid out a red carpet for people to cross between the 2 worlds, then pumped the cryptos up to the sky and when people reached a level of confidence, BAAAMM, they removed the red carpet in one swift move, leaving the crypto players stuck into Cryptoland, making tons of money in the process as they did that precisely when cryptos had maxed up and then locked the bridge because lets FACE IT - who owns the VISA circuits? Bankers
Who built the bridge for Wirex? Bankers
Who removed it without a day notice, so no one could get out? Bankers
The outcome of what they did was pretty simple, they caused a tremendous fear in crypto investors (their favourite tool) and an obvious loss of faith in the crypto system, not only, as usual, they got many people to burn a lot of money in the process so that they would lose the taste for even trying to go a different path that the one they had set our for us - banking, printing fake money, submerging us in make belief public debts with usury interest to our Governments, creating poverty, loss of jobs as taxations increased everywhere and factories had to close and move their operations to cheap China, where people are abused for our right to keep buying at very low prices (sometimes) or very high profits for them (most often), as bankers don't only own banks but the whole system - and they keep manouvering it as they please.
So, what would be my advise to the Crypto fans?
Hold on to your Cryptos, bankers are Lazy, they never worked for their money, their job is Trick and No Treat, nothing else but my belief is that a lot of cryptos migrated to the Fiat World to build unbreakable bridges, powered by those interested in keeping the crypto world alive and guess what?
When the games are over, if you sell out, you will regret it.
Cryptos can't be stopped, because they have already moved into a strong position creating many bridges into the physical world, projects that have a physical counterpart and because we are MANY, they are FEW, just like they wanted.
When we'll finally wake up to the fact that the value of Money is in the people that USE it, it will be too late for Bankers to damage the Crypto world for their own benefit and for once, they will have to get on someone else's train - or just stand as they watch it pass them by - leaving them out of the game as we move to create money out of nothing - just like they taught us.
The difference will be that in the Crypto World everyone will be able to play and that is a time you don't want to miss out friends, it's coming, it's unstoppable and can't be reversed by a bunch of lazy bastards (saying that with the best possible connotation of the word) not even if they die trying, the trying won't work and they'll just have to die.
Amen
I am not a professional crypto investor, this is my personal opinion, I am holding on to my cryptos and just hope everyone else will do the same, that's how this move will be defeated through a brave democratic choice - and not an induced fear based one.
Thanks for reading!
Very well put. For a while now I have been very suspect of the role of crypto and its place in the narrative of the financial system. And while "bankers/banksters" is a widely understood term to describe those in position to reap the rewards of debt and servitude I prefer the term chronic extortionists. A bit of a mouthful and harder to type when we feel particularly incensed but I feel it is a better description.
The funny thing to me is that in the attempt to make real their private utopia and locking out everyone who wasn't part of the in group of chronic extortionists, somewhere along the way the rest of the people began to realize they could not only do better without them, but could perhaps for the first time begin to flourish. And I suspect that it would not be unlikely for us to see a situation in which the self-styled elite become the ones locked out as they try over and over to convince us to fence ourselves in to their extortionary schema.
I don't know if crypto is the key. I don't know if crypto as we know it now will continue to function the way it does in the future. But I do know crypto is not going to disappear and the haphazard and frankly desperate attempts of the chronic extortionists will likely be beginning of their undoing.
BTW - resteemed and followed. Thanks for the insightful write up
Interesting perspectives @fatamorgana
Just came across this: https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@worldclassplayer/alan-greenspan-is-satoshi-nakamoto-road-to-roota
What you write makes a lot of sense, "they" don't want to become obsolete... We will see what happens... When Gutenberg invented the printing press, they tried to destroy it but it did not work very well... (Thank god or Gutenberg or someone)...
Source: https://museumofthebible.org/book/minutes/440