Yes, I agree with your opinion. However, due to the nature of the STEEM blockchain, it is practically impossible to completely block abuse. Analyzing every user’s transactions one by one to determine whether they are abusive is simply not realistic.

The key point I want to emphasize is that, whether they are bounty hunters or regular users, what really matters is generating meaningful transactions and data from Steemit. This is the foundation for attracting marketing opportunities from external companies, which in turn can create positive momentum for the entire ecosystem.

As you mentioned, under the current structure, abusers provide no real benefit to Steemit. It is simply a cycle of curators → reward distribution, with some users exploiting multiple accounts to extract rewards.

But if marketing from external companies were introduced, the situation could change. For example:

Marketing costs → Burn

Curators → Profit distribution

With such a structure, the ecosystem could be managed in a very different and more sustainable way.