You didn't question my previous post. You expressed your reasons for disagreeing with it. I stopped responding to you because I have no desire to attempt to persuade people against what they are settled on believing because that isn't dialogue, it's arguing.
How should I be like? You asked some questions, and I answered them. Do I owe you something else?
Well, specifically I was asking what you mean by announcing the second coming. Jesus is back? Please, I would like to hear more. I haven't seen or heard anything where I'm at, and based on my understanding of scripture I was thinking it would be a world-wide event. I'm assuming you have some deeper meaning I'm missing, so I was asking what it was.
I don't post anything in the comments section just to express my opinions on something. I only post in the interest of dialog. I enjoy it, and this is a social media platform. Your posts are interesting to me, so I try to engage.
I'm not settled on believing anything. Everything I believe is subject to re-evaluation and I really don't think there's any kind of faith worth having that can't stand up to scrutiny.
You don't owe me a thing. I was just trying to have a conversation for conversation's sake. You did answer, but they were rude answers, like you would give to someone you were hoping would stop bothering you. Okay, I will.
You're not bothering me. I just tend to not give any more information than I have to based on my experiences with people. Especially people that I don't even know. I can only assume that Garth Freeman is your real name.
The second appearing of Christ is a much bigger subject than people realize because of their understandings (or lack thereof) and conclusions surrounding the first appearing of Christ. I'm going to be addressing this in my next post, and probably others.
Yes.
Bold. Somehow I missed it. Are you claiming to be Jesus?
No.
Well, what exactly do you mean, then?
Are you being abrupt with me because you're holding a grudge against me for questioning one of your previous posts?
Don't be like that. If you don't want people to comment, what's the point of posting? I'm just trying to dialog.
What do I mean about what?
You didn't question my previous post. You expressed your reasons for disagreeing with it. I stopped responding to you because I have no desire to attempt to persuade people against what they are settled on believing because that isn't dialogue, it's arguing.
How should I be like? You asked some questions, and I answered them. Do I owe you something else?
Well, specifically I was asking what you mean by announcing the second coming. Jesus is back? Please, I would like to hear more. I haven't seen or heard anything where I'm at, and based on my understanding of scripture I was thinking it would be a world-wide event. I'm assuming you have some deeper meaning I'm missing, so I was asking what it was.
I don't post anything in the comments section just to express my opinions on something. I only post in the interest of dialog. I enjoy it, and this is a social media platform. Your posts are interesting to me, so I try to engage.
I'm not settled on believing anything. Everything I believe is subject to re-evaluation and I really don't think there's any kind of faith worth having that can't stand up to scrutiny.
You don't owe me a thing. I was just trying to have a conversation for conversation's sake. You did answer, but they were rude answers, like you would give to someone you were hoping would stop bothering you. Okay, I will.
You're not bothering me. I just tend to not give any more information than I have to based on my experiences with people. Especially people that I don't even know. I can only assume that Garth Freeman is your real name.
The second appearing of Christ is a much bigger subject than people realize because of their understandings (or lack thereof) and conclusions surrounding the first appearing of Christ. I'm going to be addressing this in my next post, and probably others.