Hmmm. I don't believe people are using their words to kill each other as such. Yes words can be used to recruit others and yes we have seen extremism of various sorts spring up. The problem is that these platforms aren't open. I can't help but feel an open source model like we have on the steem block chain would allow for contraries to weigh in unlike what we have on most platforms. Opposing views grounded in reality tend to wither extremism, racism, and violence. It doesn't do away with conflict though. There is no utopia out there and man kinds search for a utopia is littered with the bodies of millions. Absolute peace is a noble ambition, but not a reality. Contraries and opposing views will always exist and if shoved into corners or oppressed fester and grow. By limiting what we say by force we are simply inviting more violence. It's not just the hate speech that's the villain on most sites. It's just one head on the hydra. The 11 million people who will die in Yemen as a result of western intervention aren't being killed by hateful bigots online, but rather by governments/special interest that endorse the suppression of free expression as well as anything else that is contrary to what they want the population to believe. So when people begin to question what is occurring it's simply shut down or silenced. However open platforms should exist for questioning of all things and the challenging of all views to occur. Yes people will advocate violence, yes people will say horrible hurtful things, yes we will always differing opinions. These things need to exist in the open where all can see them for what they are and what they represent. I do have faith that when given the choice most of humanity would make the right decision. The key thing is allowing a place for that decision to be made. Will words be used to incite violence? Of course. They always have been. It's how we get soldiers to go to war or someone encourages an act of violence against another. Will violence always exist and people die as a result of it? Yep. I wish it wasn't true but it is. These things have always and will always exist as a part of humans being humans. Is suppressing what people say a solution? No. It's never worked and there is no example in history where that type of measure doesn't result in deaths. People may use their social media profiles to recruit people to a belief, but these extreme beliefs already existed long before computers did. Bad ideologies have always existed and will always exist. But a truly open platform where nothing can be hidden and everyone has the chance to see it for what it is provides us all with an opportunity to deal with such things and make the choice. With all information open I'd like to believe that people would make the right choices. But the limiting of freedom of expression has never worked historically and usually grows into something far deadlier later on killing far more people than the hateful words someone uses online. Thank you so much for the taking the time to read my post. Your English is good by the way. :) In regards to where I live? I'm in the UK. I don't think people are focused as such on staying alive as much as their just happy and well fed into not caring about anything more than their self interest. Being told by government what they can and can't say doesn't bother them anymore than a camera on every street corner does. More arrest are made under our anti terrorism laws for things like dog fouling, littering, and similar low level offences yet the public believe these things exist to keep them safe. But again, historically these types of things have never worked well for the people of any country once they creep in. This is just my observation of course. Could be wrong. Thanks for the comment and keep on steeming. :)