You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY: "Is Blockchain Technology about to unlock the secrets of the events of 9/11?"
I will agree there are some wild speculation on what happened that day other than what we saw. But there are some pretty solid science based fact that do not work with the official narrative of what occurred. I don't want to get into speculation. I merely want to debate the hard science proposed by other scientist. I would like to see another investigation.
What scientists and from where? What branch of science? Do you even know which branch would be most relevant? Don't use words like "fact" and "hard science". Names, credible institutions, not trolls.
You were the first to "troll". So if you don't have any intelligent response maybe you shouldn't be making any comments.
"i do find that curious. I looked up about 40 names on linkedin and only found 1 with an actual account... 9/11 wasn't an inside job. I'm not an authority or a forensic engineer but theres no inside job and blockchain solving it is just as dumb as the conspiracy itself. I guess thats the internet tho, People believe anything on that there internet."
Your first comment. Does that fit your definition of a "troll"?