You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: GODcoin's Latest Blockchain Tech Demo
The fact that you mention the "coming of the kingdom" while displaying an image of Saturn is not lost on me. The fact that you combine Islamic and Christian references is not lost on me. The masonic symbolism is not lost on me. I am also aware that what some within the meeting halls have said that the Christ has returned, while others have claimed the anti-christ has come, and that he never sleeps and subsists on Almonds.
I am concerned about the fact that you speak with such confidence, as if you speak for God Himself, and that you speak in such general terms while invoking symbols that have both dark and light implications.
Here is the thing that you probably did not know and is lost on you.
There is no such thing as "The Antichrist" this is a modern fallacy. Only in NIV and newer translations do you find "the" placed before the word antichrist. The truth is there is no SINGULAR antichrist persona. If you look up the word "anti" what does it mean? Does it mean opposite or does it mean "against". Anyone who is against Christ is literally antichrist. ANYONE can become antichrist not just a single person.
That is the great deception that Satan has used to deceive the entire world into believing that an evil figure will appear before Christ does.
Does it make sense now?
I'm agnostic as to whether there is or will be THE antichrist, but there is a consistency to the antichrist principle. Nero, Napoleon, Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and many others like them have and do live out the antichrist archetype. But the opposite is also true. Osiris, Isaac, Joseph, Daniel, Socrates, and many others like them have and do live out the Christ archetype. Yet we do recognize that there is A CHRIST that in some way fulfills the form in a more complete way than those other people have. If we apply the principle found in the Book of Coming In and Going Out (aka, the Book of the Dead), That both the darkness and the light escalate together, then it would be logical to look for AN ANTICHRIST.
But beyond that, the few things this person has put out provoke even more questions. For example, he seems to suggest the existence of a pantheon of lesser gods that seek human sacrifice. But wherever these gods are found in the Old Testament, the chosen people are told to slaughter them. You say there's no anti-christ, yet there definitely seems to be a very real conflict between Jehovah and Baal, for instance. So how do you account for that?
I'll be honest: this character resembles what I think a messiah would look like, but on close inspection, I'm finding a dearth of substance.