You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: SegWitsafact and I will spend some more time in bitcoin city.
Segwit looks to be DOA. BitcoinCash fork happens Aug 1 and will take majority hashpower with it:
Segwit looks to be DOA. BitcoinCash fork happens Aug 1 and will take majority hashpower with it:
Reality bytes:
https://www.xbt.eu/
https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@oaldamster/bitcoin-mundo-will-offer-1-gigabyte-blocks-default-of-2-megabyte-to-start-with
You just love segwit, but you don't know why. That means you're either ignorant, or a shill.
No, I Iove my friends and family. Also I do know why I prefer SegWit. And why I vote for one Bitcoin blockchain that has more potential in it than just bigger blocks.
Than you're just ignorant. Segwit has plenty of problems and no upside to it.
With every technology and innovation come challenges, I think.
SegWit will have them too. To me it would be weird if it would be perfect from the start.
And I can be ignorent at times, guess that is a bliss.
Still have not read any arguments from you why only bigger blocks are better. Even 16MB blocks mean 48 ttransactions per second at the most.
And, at the cost of a blockchain split, I consider that a high price to be paid, for only a few transactions per second more.
Do yourself a favor before you lose a lot of money and read this:
https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@ancap47/govt-sponsored-segwit-is-doa-dead-on-arrival-here-s-why
Will do so later today, thanks for sharing it.
Read it.
First thing I checked was Bitcoin Core's Github.
It is completely MIT Open Source licensed. The Bitcoin Core copyrights are just like Nakamoto Satoshi's.
Thank you for sharing your point of view. Some things are worth further investigating for me. Like a possible banking connection.
But for now I am done for today.