For about the first year I was here, the Steemit landing page was a giant banner that read MONEY TALKS, so even Steemit thinks it's all about the money.
That's probably true. SteemIt marketed this way, so we are paying the price of this today. Steem users have the collective power to change things. With more people spending their VP in a positive way, and collectively looking upon / downvoting on self-voters/abusers like bernie.
To be honest, that's what it seems like. Might as well take advantage of it.
@berniesanders ah priorities? So money is everything or what? Information and content is secondary? Please explain dude
The information and content on this site is 99% trash and doesn't deserve to be rewarded.
Fortunately there is still 1% of quality content on Steem. I'll stick to it.
@berniesanders It may be 'trash' for you, for others it's gold. What kind of trash do you talk about?
CAUTION! BERNIESANDERS IS A CHILD SEX PREDATOR! BEWARE OF HIS PREDATORY BEHAVIOR!
For about the first year I was here, the Steemit landing page was a giant banner that read MONEY TALKS, so even Steemit thinks it's all about the money.
That's probably true. SteemIt marketed this way, so we are paying the price of this today. Steem users have the collective power to change things. With more people spending their VP in a positive way, and collectively looking upon / downvoting on self-voters/abusers like bernie.
SteemIt Inc != STEEM Community
Self voting != Abuse
If it did, it wouldn't be permitted via blockchain rules. Ignoramus.
The only thing you've changed is me making more income by selling votes. Thanks!
I know that. You are both a self-voter and an abuser (@randowhale, bidbots delegations, unfair downvoting on unrelated comments, etc)
Yea, it sucks when people make money using their stake they own. Maybe if you actually owned some, you'd understand.
Sucks being poor, eh? ;-(