Hi Markku. My feeling if something is available on a site in a public domain then it is already public. I don't see anything wrong with it.
Hi Markku. My feeling if something is available on a site in a public domain then it is already public. I don't see anything wrong with it.
Sorry about my voting power hopefully it will recharge quick enough so will come back and upvote you. Got to grow quickly so I can do percentage votes. Just don't have enough and it is getting worse each day.
I understand.
To be in the public domain is very different from being published. If something is in the public domain, it is not copyrighted. Even if a digital work is published, its copyright owner retains ownership of its copyright. Republishing it without permission from the copyright owners is a copyright infringement.
The issue at hand is whether or not an embedded video can be interpreted as a link, as far as I understand this. It has never been a copyright violation to provide a link to copyrighted material published somewhere else. In 2014, ECJ made a ruling that embedding a video using inline frames is, legally, the same thing as linking.
Ok. I understand now. So just adding the link is not breaking the law. Also embedding using inline frames you said is the same as linking. You are way above me with this technical stuff lol.