You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Thinking about the Australian Electoral system....
I prefer the Australian system to the Canadian system. Canada's senate is useless (appointed by government to rubber stamp).
We have first past the post and some regions have 1 MP per 30,000 people while olthers have 1mp per 150000 people. Hardly democratic.
Also mandatory voting is awesome. Both countries have quality education and free enough media. People are dumb and make poor choices everywhere. No worries in 4~5 years we can make more poor decisions.
I agree about the Senate. Completely. But... I do like the multi-party system Canada has. It leads to less deadlock than we see in the US.
The multi-party system is great, minority governments are my favorite type. Compromise is very important on most issues.
Okay... that is pretty terrible if the second house of parliament is appointed by the governing party! The strange representation quotas is also a bit funny... I would have thought that they needed to do it by representative population... even if they have to gerrymander the whole thing...
The senate is a complete mess.
As for ridings, they try to limit it to something like 125000 (I'm not sure exactly). However, it's by the census and some areas in the suburbs near big cities grow so rapidly, 5 years or however often the census is can be a lot, especially depending on when the election is as well.
In some of the small unpopulated areas, it is because of old deals where they cannot lose ridings (East Coast Mostly). In others, it is the very underpopulated and large northern regions. Actually when looking at a national map of the colours won, sometimes it is completely misleading because there are some ridings that are 500000~ 1 million square kilometres (the three territories and the northern ridings of the larger provinces. Then there are the ones in the city that are like 20 square kilometres if that.