To understand the living world is not stiff as

To understand the living world is not stiff as it is done by the sciences, that is, in other words, the philosopher of life believes that rational cognition. Well, of course, he should be asked to get to attend. Yes, however, he obviously will not give Avaz Akimov the creation of a full-fledged picture of the world, thus there arises a certain platform for self-knowledge in order to know not only the contact The world around us through the knowledge of some objects with the help of self-knowledge It turns out We too can learn the world and the criminal record The philosophy of life is strictly negative I'm to science They are the same he looks at in Ukraine positively needs to look and in that relation the biology of physics and so now is not open to this experience but just do so on other books Well, that is essentially irrational methods or say intuition they become for the philosopher in life there is nothing important additional or not additional well, that is, in addition to rational knowledge, they will not be supplemented by rational knowledge, and thus it turns out that they strengthen knowledge by an important element and it can become more complete up to then there may be this and the completeness from their point of view was not rational cognition. That is, a person is not some kind of abstract can be a pure mind is the very totality of various elements including and even can be purely biological yes-yes living moving constantly the developing sensor is first and foremost a living being in which naturally there was much more besides the mind and all this together and make it alive and Contact gives it life that energy then that can be The next question is the most vivid presentation Philosophy of the life of someone we here predecessors of the philosophy of life can be called Arthur Schopenhauer Friedrich Nietzsche, respectively, themselves and here in life is usually distinguished as the most outstanding philosopher there is the direction of Angry Birds you and loved that apparently there are different classifications because, according to another classification, the first representative of philosophy life is Friedrich Nietzsche naturally Schopenhauer only one of the main here can be called all the time of washing the city New Year we will probably still consider Friedrich Nee Shae I on a photo it can be considered the first philosopher of life because it is a concept probably 1 updated