Sort:  

Not even than. Syria was a rich country compared to Myanmar and so was Iraq, but instead of stopping the war, they triggered it and put fuel into the fire.

If you say that the countries have intervened because there is oil richness, why is not intervention in mynmar?

It wasn't me, who said that they intervened because of the wealth; you said:

If there was wealth in this country, maybe something changed.

So I wanted to make the point, that not even in countries, where there is oil or other wealth they want to stop the war. Stopping wars is just not their agenda, because they earn many times from wars. They earn a lot of money by selling weapons, they can control the number of populations, they can stabilaze and destabilize countries and regions etc.

yes, I wanted to make the same comment, but I could not express what I wanted to say

No problem;)
At least now we got each other :)