RE: Question for Steemit’s Witnesses
Hey @soyrosa, *smiles,
Please don’t mind the shadow who did try to darken the brightness that is radiating from the adult discussion of ideas in this post.
Speaking of abuse, it seems to me that Steem’s new RC system which (since HF20?) allows for new accounts to be made by regular users, is being abused by bid-bot owners whom are using their RC to make (without any cost to themselves) hundreds of new accounts for themselves everyday, and that they are then delegating the SP of those new accounts to themselves or to their bid-bots. Is that what it also seems like, to you?
As for an app called “Steemail” being abused, what is your opinion regarding the following ideas? I thought of them after having continued to reflect upon your previous reply.
For e-mails being sent via a “Steemail” app each to require a minimum of 500 words (and not gibberish) per “steemail” sent.
For a limit of one steemail being able to be sent per day.
For no-mass steemails being able to be sent.
For such an app to feature a plagiarism-checker that scans steemails before they are sent in order make sure that the same steemails are not repeatedly sent or copied from the internet (including from the Steem blockchain)—and that if they are not original, for those steemails (if upvoted by their recipient) to be ineligible to mine Steem from the reward pool.
Do you suppose these ideas can prevent an app called “Steemail” from being abused in the way that you described?
From Lannie.