Without the state Nestle had nothing to bribe. Maybe they could hire some immoral men with guns to chase him of his homesteaded property land, but no one would think Nestle or it's hired criminals would act morally or right and would think bad of kafkanarchy if he defended himself, if I was living in his neighborhood It would be a good thing if I helped him with defending.

In contrast with how it is now, Nestle can hire the criminals with guns ( with costumes and shiny little shields as requisit) and send them to @kafkanarchy84, and most people would not blink an eye, they would even say that kafkanachy was the bad guy defending himself against the criminals and cheer for him being put in jail or to death. Because it's the law or some other excuse.

That's how it now sadly works.

edit

In both situation the man with guns would be the criminals and be most guilty. I say most because they are doing the deeds. Of course Nestle and the politicians would not go without blame.
For instance: If I would hire and assassin, that murders the human I say he must murder then I would be guilty of that murder too.

I would even argue that voters are to blame. They hire the government (which consists of hired politicians, men with guns and bureaucrats which are backed by the men with guns)