You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: This is Rojava.
Well, at least not if it keeps getting bombed out of existence.
https://listverse.com/2016/06/29/10-instances-of-anarchist-societies-that-actually-worked/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_anarchist_communities
Maybe you should look farther afield for your information, eh?
In the UK, if one was to set out an anarchist system – with no government. Everything would fall apart – crime rates would grow exponentially, no free healthcare would exist, the rich could do whatever they wanted.
Which is why an anarchist community doesn't use money.
Criminals would likely be strung up on lamp posts, and everything would be free.
The workers already do all the work, why they insist on playing a game that makes them buy back that work at a loss is a testament to how effective the mind control has been.
If the workers keep working, but stop paying, only the banksters get mad.
Yes. Can't you imagine problems if it was acceptable to string people up on lamposts, just because you and your mates accuse them of a crime.
Well, if you are a good person, and so are your neighbors, it won't be much of a problem.
When I lived in Mexico I became aware of a number of cases where bad people were given what they had coming.
When the cops got there the neighbors shrugged and said he was a bad man and that was the end of it.
I hope you can free your mind from the walls constructed by those that wish to control you.
Examine you deepest beliefs.
There are reasons that you believe that way, mostly for purposes of keeping you on the plantation and buying at the company store.
I may be a good person, but many of my neighbours are all out for themselves. The issue with anarchy is that it's such a big leap of faith, and requires everyone to follow the system to be successful that it's unlikely to be so.
All anarchy needs to be successful is that you agree not to be a criminal.
If you operated they way the gov't operates, you would be in prison.
Why do accept that it is ok for folks to be criminals, as long as they get a gov't check for doing so?
I don't accept that it's OK for people to be criminals. Prison reforms should (probably) have been underway a few years ago. But there are a huge mass of people who are criminals, and of those some are out purely to make money/their own gain. Surely if you take away everything that is regulating and keeping them in balance, it will just fall apart.
You do accept that some people get to be criminals, otherwise you would be in the streets calling for hitlery to be hung, along with the fbi agents that covered for her.
The third world controls their criminals just fine without massive gov'ts.
When I was in mexico there was very little crime in the neighborhoods because everybody knew everybody and if somebody screamed the neighbors came running with machetes hoping to get to cut some body up for bad acting.
You don't want to get a bad reputation in a free society, you won't last long.
That is why so many criminals come to the united snakes, it is much easier to live as a criminal here.
Sounds like crapitalism to me.