You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Anarcho-Capitalism isn't the "true anarchism"... but neither is Anarcho-Communism
Hi. That's a very well researched article, thank you. The point of rules is to reduce the likelyhood of conflicts. If you do not have clear and simple rules on who owns a piece of Land, you will have more conflicts. It might not be ideal, but maybe ideal is not the correct word and "utopian" is. I'd rather have someone buy a piece of Land and have every lifeform on it protected as the Buyer pleases instead of having lots of conflicts about the Land because people say there is no way of legitimately own Land.
People keep bringing up the idea that if we do not have agreements on acceptable behavior, then conflict will ensue.. which may be true. That does not, however, mean that those agreements have to be a specific one (like capitalistic land ownership), but simply that there must be agreements.