What about the nuclear power in relation to the sea wind; Why are we claiming what we are claiming? Are the arguments claiming locally and nationally in several nations valid enough and strong enough?
So, what are we claiming when we are saying and/writing anything and something, and why should we feel confidence in something while we are being where we are when being here? Well, the evidences should be just theoretical and empirical, and we are just using methods and data to measure things, and be convinced ourselves when we are here where we are. And we are just using empirical data, to test and to be sure about what we should mean in theories, and where we are just feeling that there should be facts about what is going on when we are here as we are.
So, there are arguments for nuclear power and sea wind, and the main argument with the nuclear power in relation to the sea wind, is that it is cheaper with nuclear power than the sea wind, and we can just use ourselves as being updated about what is happening many places to many times, and there are conferences, seminars and discussions and there is always the question about what we can be sure of when being engaged with the efforts that are happening many places when we are here.
So, we are starting up with the sea wind. And people are claiming that living next to equipment for sea wind is doing it difficult or impossible to sleep during the night due to the noises that are there when we are here. And the house, you have is in trouble for being sold, and there are too much chaos about the sea wind and its equipment, and people are not sure about the antecedents, processes and outcomes of these things while we are here.
So, what are really the benefits of using nuclear power or sea wind when we are here where we are when being here? Well, we cannot cover our existence and identity as humans, and we are not sure about anybody when being here, and being ourselves strong and reflected is the answer of saying and/or writing something with security and insight when we are here. So, what are the benefits of using nuclear power instead of sea wind? Well, there are several of them, and we are just stating something about this idea and things of creating power to the use of households and organizations and societies when we are here, and some important arguments are related to a list with none borders and limits while we are here. And these are according to experiences done by people:
-High Energy Density. Nuclear fuel has an exceptionally high energy density.
-Low Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
-Reliability.
-Reduced Dependence on Fossil Fuels.
-High Capital Costs.
-Risk of Nuclear Accidents – Explosions of Nuclear Power Plants.
-Limited Uranium Resources.
So, why should we use sea wind instead of nuclear power? Well, there are several arguments, and to summerize these things we must measure costs about it, and find reasons for that something should be selected of these things when we are just having some of the arguments, and we need to discover and to find the consequences.
• Offshore wind provides abundant, zero-carbon electricity.
• Offshore wind cuts power plant pollution.
• Offshore wind means jobs, economic development.
• Offshore wind makes electricity more reliable, particularly in winter.
• Offshore wind stabilizes energy prices.
Please do follow if you want to keep up with my next article. Any upvotes or resteems are hugely appreciated!
Latest article, check out :
The world inventions; The history and the case of the fountain!
Sverre Larsen
Kristiansand, Norway
