Hello @luxalok, thank you for your participation in this week’s Steemit Learning Challenge. Here is your evaluation:

Question 1: Why Build a Custom Indicator?

Your explanation is insightful and contextually relevant. You clearly explain the limitations of traditional indicators and the evolving nature of markets, especially in the crypto environment. The mention of AI and customization needs for Steem/USDT enhances the reasoning. This section could be slightly more concise to improve focus.

Question 2: Your Indicator’s Concept

The dual-indicator approach (Dynamic S/R and POC+VWAP) is both original and well-explained. The logic behind volume-based level detection is clear, and the justification for combining them with VWAP and proxy POC adds strength. Including the technical mechanism and settings was especially informative. A diagram or schema summarizing how the logic works would further improve clarity.

Question 3: How to Use It

This section is strong. You explain how to adjust the indicator for different timeframes and provide actionable examples with level readings (S1, R2, POC, etc.). You also point out the behavior of the indicator under different settings. This practical guidance is extremely helpful. Still, a bit more emphasis on how signals are confirmed (beyond level bouncing) would polish this even more.

Question 4: Pros & Cons

You’ve presented a very balanced and honest evaluation of your indicator. The limitations—such as the simplified POC logic, chart clutter, and lack of session-based VWAP—are well addressed. The structure here is clean and informative. Mentioning future development ideas or workarounds for the cons (e.g., using custom session resets or external data) would enhance this even more.

Question 5: Case Study or Backtest

The scenario analysis is thorough and realistic. You effectively walk us through the logical sequence of entries/exits using chart levels and conditions. This storytelling approach makes the case relatable and easier to understand. Adding a visual with the numbered points referenced in the analysis (1, 2, 3...) would have elevated this further.

Final Score: 9.0/10

Fantastic work, @luxalok! This is a technically advanced and well-structured entry. You showed originality, deep understanding, and thoughtful analysis. For further improvement, tighten some lengthy explanations, visualize your indicator's logic flow, and refine formatting for better readability. Keep pushing the boundaries—this was a solid performance!