In search of abusers // Weekly Report 162 // 08-06-2025.
Content review is necessary to detect content abuse on platforms like Steemit, and this is essential for several reasons. First, it damages the platform's reputation. Second, it violates community policies; and finally, it can exploit the reward system without adding value to the platform.
As part of the Steem Watcher team, I review content on the platform and report detected abuse cases, with the aim of curbing content protocol violations and maintaining Steemit's good reputation.

Below I share the cases that were detected and validated as abuse, most of the accounts are related to a farming community.
No. | Post Link | Source | Abuser ID | Abuse Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Link | Link | @xafad | Reward Farming |
2 | Link | Link | @fedeki | Reward Farming |
3 | Link | Link | @dejemi | Reward Farming |
4 | Link | Link | @dejemi | Reward Farming |
5 | Link | Link | @agor | Repeat Content |
6 | Link | Link | @agor | Repeat Content |
(*) Reported for the first time.
Each content goes through a variety of tools that serve to verify the authenticity of the content of each publication.
Search Tools.
Plagiarism Detectors | AI Content Detectors |
---|---|
quetext | openai |
etxt.biz | zerogpt |
plagiarismchecker | gptzero |
plagiarismdetector | contentatscale |
check-plagiarism | Paraphrasingtool |
prepostseo | Crossplag |
smallseotools |
To conclude my report, it is necessary to point out that in each case identified, I leave in the comment a link to the @abuse-watcher publication where some information and advice on plagiarism and abuse is shared.
I appreciate the confidence of the Steem-watcher team, we are at your service.