Towards the biological and machine interface

Towards the biological and machine interface



Souce


What will be the next frontier in robotics? To answer this question, let's take a look at this robot dog, which is guided by a mini human brain grown in a laboratory. Researchers in the United States demonstrated this by attaching brain organoids, tiny 3D models of the brain, to a graphene interface and using light to stimulate and read neural responses in real time, showing that these robots can create a kind of symbiosis between organic matter and silicon.


The idea is to use applied biophysics to teach living tissue to converse with machines. The trick has a name: GraMOS, which stands for graphene-mediated optical stimulation. Instead of optogenetics, which requires genetically editing neurons, or direct electrical currents that can damage tissue, graphene, a sheet of carbon one atom thick, converts light into subtle, biocompatible electrical signals.


The result is that neurons are stimulated without touching the DNA, and at the same time, thematuration of the organoid is accelerated, with more synapses and more circuits to work with, a crucial element in research that suffers from the slow development of these models. In the demonstration, the robot dog detected an obstacle, sent the event to the graphene organ, the tissue responded, and the robot changed course, a closed sensory-motor cycle, in addition to the rapid reflex, 50 milliseconds. The strong point is the adaptation when simulating sensory inputs with light.




The organoid tends to learn and reorganize connections, neuroplasticity, something that traditional chips do not do naturally. This opens up hypotheses for more responsive prosthetics, adaptive robotics, and even biological computing based on living tissue.


Translating the mechanism, light hits the graphene, the material generates micro electrical stimuli, the neurons fire in patterns, the interface reads that activity and translates it into motor commands. It is like giving the tissue frequent sensory nudges so that it matures and then reacts to events in the world. And since there is no genetic editing, the path to scale and safety is theoretically shorter than with invasive techniques.


For now, it is a laboratory study with small organoids and controlled environments. The questions that really matter for it to become applied technology remain unanswered: long-term stability, reproducibility between samples, robustness outside the laboratory, safety maps, including ethical ones, and how to train these tissues for complex tasks without losing control of the system.


We are not talking about connecting this to live human brains either; the debate here is about biohybrids in the lab and future medical or robotic applications.


If you could choose the first application for this living brain at a glance, you would go for more natural prosthetics, fine control and tactile feedback, robots that learn tasks in minutes, or bio-computational chips for problems where silicon still slips up.




Sorry for my Ingles, it's not my main language. The images were taken from the sources used or were created with artificial intelligence