SLC-S24/W4 - Powerful Debate | Deal or No Deal".

Source

Thompson is a hardworking man, he married at his youthful age due to the nature of his work Thompson was seeing money on a daily basis so the wife got relaxed without looking for something to do, it wasn't a burden to Thompson hence the money was there, the wife wants to buy cream, shoes even biscuits she will call the husband,she never for one day told the husband what she will like to do so that the husband can support her, she was just using the many that the husband drops for them ,at a point the man started worrying about the burden of the house because he was stressed out, the unexplainable happened and Thompson lost his job they started feeding from hand to mouth, with this story I want to debate on No Deal for the below topic

Do you think it is ideal for financial burden of a home to be managed by the husband alone.(Explain your answer by choosing Deal or No Deal)

When man and woman is married they automatically become one that means they should share everything in common. I'm on the side of helping my husband to carry out financial burden, mine may not be much but at least I don't buy the idea of leaving the whole financial burden of my home to be managed by my husband alone the reasons are as follows.

• Authoritativeness . When the husband is shouldering all the financial burden at home he will feel on top of the world and determines what the money will be used for thereby making the woman inferior as well covering the woman's dreams.

• No visible savings. When the husband is managing all the finances it make it difficult for the family to have long term savings, this can be as a result of too many expenses.

• Lack of trust. When the husband is managing all the financial burden the wife will not believe or know when the man is not buoyant to carry on the normal bills and this can lead to disagreement in the house.

• Helpless and hopeless. When the man is managing all the financial burden at home and something happens to him, the family will become helpless and hopeless. At times it leads to depression on the woman's side and makes her vulnerable .

• No contribution in financial decision making. Since it's the man that is taking all the financial burden, it's believed that the woman will have nothing to contribute during any financial decision making.

Source

• Restrictions of freedom. If the man is managing all the financial burden of the house he will restrict the woman's movement hence he is the one with the money.

• Abuse of emotion. If the man is controlling all the financial burden of the house, he can as well choose when to make the woman happy financially, because women like to buy things that makes them happy including outing. But when it's only the man the woman's emotions can be abused .

Summarily, when financial burdens are shared between husband and wife no matter the percentage to the woman though the woman's own should be moderate it gives everyone equal right to do whatever they like . Without no further explanation I'm sure you can agree with me on No deal for the husband to manage the financial burden of the house alone .

I'm inviting @lirvic @m-fdo @udyliciouz